Joel E. Tohline, Professor
Louisiana State University
Department of Physics & Astronomy,
202 Nicholson Hall,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803-4001 U.S.A.
Through this document, I am requesting permission from the LSU Board of Supervisors to take one full semester of sabbatical leave at full pay during the Spring semester of the year 2000. |
1. Purpose and Objectives of the Leave
This sabbatical leave will provide an opportunity for me to become immersed in several specific research activities at an educational institution that offers a rich tradition of academic excellence and a stimulating research environment, but where I will be uninterrupted by regular classroom teaching duties and the numerous regular committee assignments that have become associated with my daily routine at LSU. My primary objectives are:
In connection with objective #1, my expectation is that modern data from millimeter arrays can be used to critically evaluate the physical significance of numerical models of star forming clouds that have been constructed in recent years by my research group and that a firm understanding of such data will play a critical role in defining my future research directions at LSU. Objective #2 has emerged as a direct consequence of the construction of the LIGO site near Livingston, Louisiana, within an hour's drive of the LSU campus. Should the modeling expertise developed within my group at LSU prove to be sufficiently complementary to ongoing modeling efforts that are directly connected with LIGO, I will seriously consider expanding the research efforts of my group to include the investigation of astrophysical problems that are directly related with LIGO activities.
2. Outline of Proposed Activities
A significant portion of my research activities over the past 15 years
at LSU have been focused on the development of tools (primarily in the
form of efficient numerical algorithms) that will permit astronomers to
accurately model the structure, stability, and dynamical evolution of rapidly
rotating, (Newtonian) self-gravitating astrophysical fluid systems.
Through continuous funding from the astronomy division of the National
Science Foundation (NSF), much of this work has been conducted with the
expressed desire to obtain a better understanding of the processes by which
stars form in galaxies. Since 1987, seven students have completed
their doctoral dissertation research under my direction at LSU. (A brief
account of each student's research accomplishments and present place of
employment can be obtained online at
In recent years, my group's modeling efforts have been primarily aimed at answering the question, "Why do stars tend to form in pairs?" This has been in response to recent observational investigations of the frequency of occurrence of pre-main-sequence binary stars which have reinforced earlier suspicions that ''binary formation is the primary branch of the star-formation process'' (Mathieu 1994). More specifically, we have focused on adiabatic (as opposed to isothermal) phases of protostellar cloud evolution in an effort to understand how binary stars with relatively short (fraction of a year to a few hundred years) orbital periods form.
Detailed Aside:
Because the dynamical time associated with a given protostellar cloud
tdyn »
[Grmean]-1/2,
where rmean is
the mean mass density of the cloud material, and according to
Kepler's 3rd law orbital periods are approximately
3tdyn,
one can readily ascertain from which
cloud structures various short period binary systems
will form. For example, a rotationally flattened region of a
protostellar gas cloud with
a mean number density of molecular hydrogen nH2 » 1011 cm-3
-- that is,
a mean mass density of 3 x 10-13
|
Because rapidly rotating, gaseous disks appear to frequently (if not always!) accompany protostellar objects and very young stars, we also have attempted to understand (a) how circumstellar and/or circumbinary disks form in association with and interact with nascent stars; and (b) to what extent the binary star formation process depends on the existence of a disk of significant mass (cf., Woodward, Tohline, and Hachisu 1994; Andalib, Tohline, and Christodoulou 1997).
Most significantly, using two quite independent modeling techniques,
my group recently has demonstrated that it is possible
to construct dynamically stable, self-gravitating configurations
with highly nonaxisymmetric structures (for example, ellipsoidal and
dumbbell-shaped objects) out of highly compressible gases such as
the gases that comprise protostellar clouds.
These nonaxisymmetric configurations rotate coherently as though they
were solid objects, but in reality they exhibit strongly differential
(sometimes supersonic) internal motions.
In many respects these objects appear to be
compressible analogs of the family of incompressible ellipsoids with
internal motions
that were discovered by Riemann over a century ago (see Chandrasekhar
1969 for a thorough review of Riemann's incompressible figures of
equilibrium). As we have argued in a paper presented recently
at the "Numerical Astrophysics 1998" conference in Tokyo
(Tohline, Cazes, and Cohl 1998), proof of
the existence of these dynamically stable nonaxisymmetric models
permits us to resurect the "fission hypothesis of binary star
formation." (The text of this conference paper, along with several
animation sequences illustrating the dynamical properties of our
nonaxisymmetric equilibrium models is available online as an html
document at the following URL:
Via such a model of binary star formation, evolution is driven by slow cooling and associated slow contraction of the cloud. Because such an evolution would occur over many dynamical times, it is conceivable that protostellar clouds can be "caught" during such a phase of their evolution and that their structural properties can be observed using millimeter-wave radio telescope arrays. (By contrast, if short period binary systems form through direct "Jeans" fragmentation, the binary formation process will happen within only a few dynamical times -- too quickly for this critical phase of cloud evolution to be studied observationally.)
3. Location of Leave
My plans are to base my sabbatical leave activities on the campus of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, California. In concert with my planned research activities, described above, I will have two primary academic contacts at Caltech:
Movie1 |
Quicktime (5,907K) |
This work has been supported, in part, by the U.S. National Science Foundation through grant AST-9528424 and, in part, by grants of high-performance-computing time at the San Diego Supercomputer Center and through the PET program of the NAVOCEANO DoD Major Shared Resource Center in Stennis, MS.
4. Alternate Plans (in case original plans are not accomplished)
5. Travel Plans
6. Compensation
I do not expect to receive any compensation from sources other than the LSU System while on leave.
7. Courses to be Taken
I do not expect to audit any formal courses or to take any courses for academic credit while I am on leave.
8. Scholarly Standing and Benefit to the University
Andalib (1998) recently has developed a self-consistent-field technique that can be used to
Movie4 |
Quicktime (6,927K) |
The similarity between the flow illustrated in Movie2 and the flow in Andalib's model P (Movie4) is striking. Apparently Andalib's model provides a good 2D analog of th